About Me

Name: Allen Caeden
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Great polling data for Sarah Palin!

So where does Sarah Palin stand right now? Well according to the recent Public Policy Poll (PPP) she is doing quite well, in fact she is in the lead of all potential GOP 2012 contenders.

Sarah Palin favorability rating among conservative Republicans is 73%, Huckabee is at 65%, and Romney is at 53%. Sarah Palin also has a 45% approval rating among registered independents, which is just under half of their support. Sarah Palin also scored huge among Hispanic voters with a 51% approval rating, with not even a close second among GOP 2012 hopefuls. Sarah Palin also leads among GOP 2012 contenders with the 18-29 age range with 51% having a favorability rating in what is traditionally considered a Democratic stronghold.

In every region in the country Sarah Palin is in the lead against all the other GOP 2012 hopefuls; with 43% in the Northeast, 47% in the South, 50% in the Midwest, and 51% in the West.  

How about among GOP “moderates” surely Sarah Palin is not doing well with this demographic, right? Wrong the PPP Poll finds that, “For the second month in a row we found Sarah Palin as the most popular of the leading 2012 GOP hopefuls among moderate Republicans. 64% have a positive opinion of her compared to 57% for Newt Gingrich, 53% for Mike Huckabee, and 45% for Mitt Romney.”

So for Sarah Palin the sky is the limit, and she has yet to really start taking the fight to the Democrats and Obama. Sarah Palin finds herself in an excellent position if she decided to run for the White House in 2012. As I said before he comes The Northern Storm!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The real Mitt Romney.

Since Rasmussen has Mitt Romney as the current GOP front runner for 2012, I thought conservatives should hear how liberal Mitt Romney really is in his own words. Listen to Romney:
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

GOP Bullcrap!!!!!

I love this new line put forth by the GOP pundits and Washington "elites". The line goes like this, " Well everyone knows that the #2 guy in past primaries goes on to be the next in line for the Republican nomination." Thus, since Mitt Romney was number two guy last year, then he is "next in line" for 2012. Funny nobody knew about this "rule" until the worthless David Frum a leftist member of the GOP discovered it about two months ago. Now we hear it pandered by the GOP Washington chattering class. Funny given that the GOP base rejected Romney because he was in the past a fullblown liberal and flipped flopped on every issue when he wanted to be president.
 
But is this theory really true? In 1976 Gerald Ford was never even in a primary. In 1980 when Reagan was the number two guy in 1976 and should have been "next in line" the GOP Washington elites still hated Reagan, viciously attacked him and backed Bush 41. In 1996 Dole was not the number two guy, Quayle was. In 2000 little Bush J.R. was never even in a primary prior to running for president in 2000. Folk's this bulllllshiiiiitttt lie was put forth for one reason and this is that they do not want a conservative like Sarah Palin to win the nomination in 2012. Thus they are backing a man who was a liberal accross the board (save taxes) and not a conservative, Mitt Romney. This is not new they hated Ronald Reagan and now they hate Sarah Palin as well. Is it any wonder that there is a hate relationship between the GOP base and the GOP elites?       YouTube - The Real Romney?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mitt Romney????

In two recent polls Romney just barely etched out other candidates as the GOP candidate to vote for in 2012. However, there is a problem for Romney, because in both polls he really cannot break past 30% (at the most) of the GOP. If one combines Palin and Huckabee's numbers which consists of far more conservative voters than those who support Romney (moderate voters) you have over 50% of the GOP who do not want Romney. Why? Because Romney for most of his life was a liberal and it was not until he wanted to buy the presidency that he "discovered" Reaganism, a president whom he has publically distanced himself in the past. If you do not believe me about how liberal Romney has been then listen to him in his own words from this youtube clip. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin, and the GOP elietes

Yesterday on his show Rush Limbaugh had this to say about Sarah Palin and the GOP Washington elietes who do not like her:
 
"We have too many people in our party who allow media to influence what they think of our own candidates, and they're looking at it the wrong way... The liberals, the left, the Drive-By Media, they are telling us who our nomination should be! They are telling us who they are most afraid of... Name for me one Republican candidate who has maintained a 72% approval rating while their life and their career has been under assault for the purpose of destruction, which is the case with Sarah Palin... If there are any of you wimpy, wishy-washy Republicans out there who so desperately want to have a candidate that the sophisticates in the media in Washington and New York approve of, you are guaranteed to secure the Republican Party defeat after defeat after defeat. If you're going to let them pick our nominee -- which happened last time, by the way."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is Sarah Palin mastering the liberal media?

Is Sarah Palin framing the debate? Today Sarah Palin attacked Obama over the “cap & tax” energy bill in the Washington Post of all places. Well it did not take long for George Soros and his ilk at Moveon.org to strike back at Sarah Palin, who is the Republican they fear the most. This leads me to wonder if over the course of the next three years a ferociously bloody battle will rage between Sarah Palin who represents the GOP conservative opposition and the Obama Marxist regime. Sarah Palin I believe is learning how to master the liberal media who are obsessed with her, and with no other Republican. What do I mean by this? The liberal media is so obsessed with Sarah Palin that they report pretty much everything she says and does; even when it hurts their own cause, like today’s Washington Post oped piece by Palin. Thus, Sarah Palin knows that when she attacks Obama that the liberal media will faithfully report it even though it hurts their precious Obama, and she is the only Republican who can do this because of the liberal media’s obsession with her. Sarah Palin knows that she has the biggest microphone in the GOP and this frames the political landscape for the next three years as Sarah Palin vs. Obama, which will put her in an excellent position for the GOP primaries in 2012 because she already will be seen as the “anti-Obama” candidate. I am certain that we will see a very bloody battle between Sarah Palin and the Obama machine over the next three years. As I have said before here comes “The Northern Storm” from Alaska!  

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A liberal Mitt Romeny in his own words.

You guys who support Romney for the GOP nomination in 2012, think that he is a conservative?  You might want to think again, here is Mitt Romney in his own words on his liberal policicies.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sarah Palin's two front war.

   What I find interesting is that Sarah Palin has to fight a two front war during the next three and half years. First, let me say that I do believe that Sarah Palin has her eyes set on the White House in 2012. I believe Sarah Palin sees what Obama is doing to this country and she is determined to take him down in the next election and I believe he is well aware of this and I believe that he was misusing the ethics laws in Alaska in an attempt to keep Sarah Palin chained up in Alaska where she could do little for the GOP in both 2010 and her own presidential aspirations in 2012. This is why Sarah Palin’s resignation announcement was a major kick in the balls to Obama and Democrats alike. They did not expect this, they expected to keep her shackled up in Alaska for the next 18 months, but now Palin whom I have nicknamed “The Northern Strom” is coming down to the lower 48 and Obama and his ilk now know that she is taking the fight to them and they do not know what to do about it.   

   Sarah Palin is faced with two opponents; the first is obviously the Democrats with their coconspirators in the liberal media. But another war that must be wage by Sarah Palin is against the GOP elites in Washington D.C. a group of people who are dead set against her. These GOP Beltway types are not Traditional Conservatives in the Reagan mold, and in fact they strenuously opposed Reagan in both 1976 and in 1980. The funny thing is that while the GOP Base wants another Reagan, the GOP elite do not. Their kind of president would be Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, and lastly little Bush J.R. These are big government types who can spend money and grow government almost as bad as any Democrat can (save Obama, Pelosi, and Reid). It seems at the present time their candidate of choice is Mitt Romney, who was a full blown liberal Republican until he wanted to buy the White House and pretended to “love” Reagan in last year’s primaries. I find this funny given in the past how he distanced himself from Reagan’s policies publicly. So why do the GOP elites want Mitt Romney? Well in short because he is one of them, a big government,  a closet socially liberal type who will do their bidding.

   However some bad news came out for the GOP elites and Mitt Romney today. Sarah Palin’s political action committee raised in 5 months $733,000 with very, very, little advertising and no campaigning by Sarah Palin, (she has raised another $200,000 since her disclosure). Romney’s Political Action Committee raised $1.4 million over six months. Now what is interesting is that Romney is and has been in full campaign mode for years now and his only current job is raising money with the help of rich GOP elites for himself. Sarah Palin’s PAC is little known and Sarah has not been in campaign mode, and she will not until she steps down as Governor of Alaska in about two weeks, and it should be noted that most of her financial support comes from the grassroots and not the overly rich like Romney.

   So Sarah Palin must first defeat the GOP elites and their candidate of choice, Mitt Romney and then remake the GOP back into the image of Traditional Conservatism, back into the image of Ronald Reagan. Then she must take out Obama, and never fear Sarah Palin is quite skilled in hunting, politically killing, and mounting a donkey’s head on her wall.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Iowa GOP wants Palin and neither Romney or Huckabee.

This article by Thomas Beaumont in the Des Moines Register can be found at:

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20090709/NEWS09/907090361/1056

 
Iowa Republican Party officials Wednesday said they are aggressively courting Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin to headline the state GOP's premier annual fundraising event.

And they have put a well-connected Des Moines woman in charge of trying to land the 2008 vice presidential nominee and popular party figure in the leadoff caucus state.

Aides to Palin did not immediately respond to Des Moines Register inquiries about whether the outgoing governor would consider the invitation to appear at the Ronald Reagan Dinner. The event has become a popular and high-profile stop for would-be presidential candidates.

But Becky Beach, a Des Moines woman with long personal ties to the Bush family and presidential campaigns, said she hopes her connections can improve the chances with the in-demand, outgoing governor. "Absolutely, I'm trying to get her here," Beach said. "It would be a huge event."

Beach, who is helping the state party with fundraising and event planning, had begun trying to reach Palin's team before the announcement last week that Palin plans to step down as governor on July 26. Beach said she hopes to have another conversation as early as next week.

Iowa Sen. Charles Grassley plugged the idea of inviting Palin to help raise money. He recalled Palin's reception in Iowa during the presidential campaign.

Palin was greeted by a big, enthusiastic crowd during her first trip to Iowa with Republican presidential nominee John McCain in September. She drew even larger crowds for solo stops in Sioux City, Des Moines and Dubuque.

"I think she has quite a following in Iowa, and maybe I'm impressed because, at the three events I spent with her in Iowa during the last campaign, she had bigger turnouts than McCain had," Grassley told reporters.

But it was far from certain whether Palin would be in Iowa anytime soon.

First, she is the most-sought-after personality in the Republican Party, longtime Iowa Republican campaign adviser Dave Roederer said.

The cell phone voice mail for Palin spokeswoman Meg Stapleton on Wednesday was full and not accepting new messages.

Also, it was not clear whether Palin was stepping down to lay the groundwork for a 2012 presidential campaign or for other reasons.

Meanwhile, Palin remains very new to the national political scene and has few Iowa contacts, Roederer said.

"I think it's fair to say there's really no direct connections with Palin's office and anyone in the state," he said.

But the Reagan dinner, which doesn't have a date set yet for this year, has regularly drawn would-be presidential candidates hoping to make an impression on potential caucusgoers.

Jeff Boeyink, executive director of the Republican Party of Iowa, said the demand for Palin suggests her appearance in Iowa would make for a blockbuster event.

"We would need a very large venue to make it happen," he said.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Palin, Romney, conservatives, and the fate of the GOP in 2012

A Rasmussen Poll has things pretty much at a three way tie for a GOP 2012 primary. Rasmussen Reports:

“In a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey, it’s close to a three-way tie when GOP voters are asked whom they would vote for – from among a list of six prominent Republicans - in the 2012 party primary in their state: 25% say Romney, while 24% say Palin and 22% opt for former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee.”
 
A few things should be noted about this poll, because questions need to be asked. Why did Rasmussen conduct this poll on monday, only four days after Palin's recognition, which also was a holiday weekend? This poll had what seems to me to be an intended bias against Sarah Palin because many of her supporters were still very much confused over Palin's decision and had not had time to get over the initial shock factor that even I was going through. In fact on tuesday the day the poll was released Sarah Palin gave about a half a dozen interviews clarifying her decision to resign, those polled did not have the benefit of such interviews because they were polled too soon. My guess is that if the poll was conducted today after the initial confussion, Palin would have won by a decent margin.
 
Another point is that while Romney may have scored 25% which is an insiginificant number in a poll like this, something needs to be pointed out. While Romney polled 25%, but between Palin's and Huckabee's poll numbers combined to equal 56% of those polled it can be safely said that they do not want Romney as the GOP candidate for 2012. Even if Romney wins the nomination (and pretty much every Washington Beltway GOP screwup seems to be backing this horse) one thing should be noted. Palin and Huckabee supporters are conservatives, whereas Romney's supporters tend to be more moderate. Remember Mitt Romney was quite the liberal until he decided he wanted to be president and flipped flopped on just about every issue. Did you know that Romney believes in socialized medical care? Yep "Romney Care" in Massachusetts has turned into an absolute nightmare, with only some 20% of people who think it is a "success". So why should we castigate Obama over socialized medicine and give Mitt Romney a pass? I could go through many policy and cultural issues of this sort concerning Romney.
 
I want to get back to my point which is that the Washington Beltway types should understand, there is no guarentee that Palin and Huckabee supporters will turn out for Mitt Romney in 2012, if he should win the GOP nomination. The GOP base is sick of having to elect RINOS and moderates to office. In 2006 many conservatives stayed home during the mid-term elections after Republicans led by George Bush cast aside conservatism and spent money like druken liberals. Many even bolted from the GOP all together, I was one of them. In the last election I would not have voted for McShame if it was not for Sarah Palin, and there were millions just like me. We are sick of phoney conservatives and so called moderates. If the GOP Washington Beltway types back Romney then you can be sure that they are still at odds with Reagan Conservatism and for this sin many (and I mean many) conservatives like myself will stay home instead of voting for another RINO phoney conservative, even if it means four more years of Obama. This conservative is done playing the GOP bulllll sh!!!!!t game.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

From Josh Painter on the power of Sarah Palin.

Thursday, July 9, 2009

Sarahcuda resignation fires up the palinosphere

With her announcement that she will resign the govenrorship of Alaska this month, there has been a significant increase in legacy media coverage of Sarah Palin. there has been a corresponding boost in Palin-related new media activity,especially on right of center websites. We have long urged our fellow conservative bloggers to turn up the volume and the frequency of their Palin posts, and the governor's July 3 announcement has sparked them into action. For the first time since her RNC acceptance speech, the right side of the blogosphere is drowning out the negative left end's well coordinated Palin-bashing with positive and encouraging coverage of the Republican Party's superstar. Here's a sampling:

*

A Time For Choosing:
"Sarah is at a unique point in history and knows it. She is at the cusp of a real movement in America."
Alaska Governor Sarah Palin's Accomplishments:

"We want Palin... We need her. She knows it. She is heeding our call."

City on a Hill Political Observer:
"She can begin to harness this grassroots movement that has started with the tea parties and build it into a real wave of change in a way that Romney's pizza parlors full of 100 or so people can't do."
Sarah Palin 2012:
"At what point would her judgment be questioned by not quitting? I wonder, did they think Palin should just fight all these complaints endlessly until they literally bankrupted her family?"
It's a Kwazy Life:
"Who needs to quote the movie Field of Dreams' character, Ray Kinsella telling his wife 'It's okay honey, I ... I was just talking to the cornfield' when you had a cornfield being cut down with Palin's figure. You want life imitating art? You have it."
Moms for Sarah Palin:
"Sarah Palin putting her own future at risk to fight for our whole country is more admirable to me than any governor's term she didn't finish."
Conservative Cupcake:
"Gov. Palin... You did the right thing to protect your children from the harm that could result from the attacks by the rabid democrats. You did the right thing to say NO MORE wasting taxpayer money to deal with frivolous ethics complaints. You said no more intrusion into Alaska by liberal media vultures descending for the sole purpose of destroying your credibility and political future. I donated to SarahPAC today to honor you and your integrity."
Sarah's Web Brigade:
"Even as the left gleefully pronounces the death of Palin's political career and the GOP, conservative grassroots activists continue to network, train, plan, and build for campaigns from the school board to the White House. Now Palin is in the game, ready to lead a new full-court press in 2010 and beyond."
The Spyglass:

"Leaving office may well have been the best political move Gov. Palin could have made—and a necessary precursor to a 2012 presidential run, if she wants to make one—and if so, then far better to do so now... It may also be the wisest financial move she could make. Not only does this preclude further attempts to bankrupt her via frivolous prosecution, it also gives her a much wider field to raise funds and earn money."

Moms 4 Sarah Palin:
"I could care less what her next move is. It won't change my opinion of her. I respect her as a brilliant politician, I admire her stand for God and her stand for life. I agree with her conservative principles. As long as those things don't change, I'll remain steadfast in my support of her, no matter what path she chooses next."
The Pajama Underground:
"You want the new face of conservatism? You want to get serious about fundraising? Palin is your girl, people. She‘s a rock star in a movement full of aging big band leaders. Who else is there that can simultaneously fire up the base and command the media‘s attention simply by walking on to a stage?"
Governor Palin for President 2012:
"The bottom line is that Governor Palin is doing what the entire party should be doing. She is defending her family, her honor, and her convictions. In so doing, she is swimming against the tide in her own party where political chameleons like Romney are lauded and other leaders abandon their families for mistresses despite their "convictions" of faith and family."
Pundit & Pundette:
"Sarah Palin is easiest to understand when taken at face value. Imputing her with Machiavellian motives adds lots of intrigue but doesn't offer any answers that make more sense than the ones she's given."
Conservatives 4 Palin:
"What do we Ordinary Americans hear in Sarah Palin? We hear a person who doesn't make wild promises. She doesn't promise to give everyone a pet unicorn and an eco-friendly magic carpet. She promises to protect our interests by reining in the growth of this selfish beast that eats our tax dollars and finds new ways to bring our country to the brink of disaster. She promises to responsibly lead us in completing missions in distant countries where we never wanted to go and hope never to have to return. She doesn't promise that the wars will be over tomorrow, but she does promise that we will listen to our generals from now on so that we won't be seeing dozens of flag-draped coffins every month. She doesn't promise that the whole world will love us again (if they ever did), but she promises that we will stay strong enough to deter those who don't like us, and we will become self-sufficient in the one area most crucial to our long term security and peace -- energy."
The Freedom Post:
Stapleton called Palin's resignation a "fighting move."
"This is a move that says, 'Enough, I'm not going to keep hitting my head against this wall. I'm not playing politics as usual. You go play that game. I'll go play it another way and at another court,' so she can get something done and make a difference with the issues and values that are important to her," Stapleton told FOX News.
Another court? Just what court is Ms. Stapleton speaking of? The national court perhaps?
The Sarah Palin Blog:

"Why is Sarah Palin stepping down as Governor of Alaska? Rick Sanchez, the anchor dolt on CNN, wonders if she is pregnant again... It was a dumb, sexist comment. Why is she resigning? Must be pregnant. That is like saying 'must be that time of the month' when a woman is angry."

Caffeinated Thoughts:
"Now Senator Grassley is certainly entitled to his opinion... what I take umbrage with is the phrase, 'just being a private citizen.' This has become a meme the last few days... This is ludicrous, and it is a meme that needs to get stomped down in the GOP right away."
[i heart] sarah palin[tology]:
"While many speculate that there is something deeper going on behind the scenes, those who follow Sarah know that this is classically Sarah - the Sarah Brand of doing things unconventionally but with a servant’s heart."
Republican Catholics:
"Sarah Palin was made for such a time as this. Like Esther from Biblical days she appears in 2009 and will conquer 2012. Independent and strong, our Emma Peel,Bionic Woman and Wonder Woman rolled into one."
Inspiration Sarah:
"This is only the beginning for Sarah! God has great plans in mind for her and she will embrace every opportunity that God throws her way! So to all who are absent from this fight--join us!"
Manley's Republic:
"I urge Mrs. Palin: Tread carefully, madam. Study the landscape in detail before you venture forth to preach your evangel, for there are snakes everywhere and the most deadly among them dwell in our own midst."
Why Mommy is a Palin Supporter:
"The GOP Beltway types are counting out Libertarian support for people like Sarah Palin, as well as people who've been disillusioned and stopped voting years ago because they lost faith in their government -- people like my own mother who never voted for a Republican in her life and whose last vote was for Carter when he opposed Ford. She lost faith in government until Sarah Palin was announced in Dayton. The next day, she registered to vote as an Independent and in November she voted the GOP ticket..,because of Sarah Palin."
South Texian:
"If you think experience might be a potential problem vis-à-vis a potential Palin candidacy in 2012, consider that in 1912, Woodrow Wilson was elected President of the United States after having had only two years of elective political experience as the Governor of New Jersey."
Palin Drone:
"If you insist on using the word "quit" to describe her perfectly rational (yet still emotionally gut-wrenching) decision to resign her office, then I think you need to do some serious thinking - and not through the politicial prism that some would-be prognosticators of the '12 presidential race have done, but through the eyes of the person in the eye of the storm."
Stepping right UP!:
"Tired of President Obama yet? Donate to SarahPAC."
Select Sarah Palin:
"She will continue to fight against the corruption and greediness which led this great nation to a deep recession/depresssion, and the uncertainty still continues. With the great support of all her increasing true supporters, we all are determined that Sarah Palin will soon lead the country..."
Conservatism for a Millennial:
"All I know is that Sarah Palin believes in what I believe in. And like Reagan, she ignites people and gives them an outlet for their voices to be heard. She loves her country and state more than anything. Which is why she resigned."
Sarah Sarah:
"The liberal left is scared to death of Sarah Palin. Why else would she still be the target of such ugliness 8 months AFTER the election is over?"
Hillbilly White Trash:
"Sarah Palin is the most dangerous person in the world to the political left. They realize that unless they destroy her she could attain the Oval Office with the kind of popular mandate that would allow her to undo vast amounts what the left has managed to accomplish in their goal to ruin and destroy the nation."
sarahpalinvpwoman:
"Do NOT underestimate her. She is a very smart woman. She KNOWS what she is doing. And she has Obama's number. Not only does she know and agree with those of us who realize Obama is RUINING OUR COUNTRY, she also knows how devious he is. She says several times that these Ethics Complaints are stemming from the White House."
The Pink Flamingo:
"Funny how there were never any ethics complaints until Palin started appearing on the national scene, say July of last year. It’s all about teaching her a lesson – and teaching one to the rest of us. Don’t mess with Barack Obama or he and his minions will destroy us all. They plan to do that anyway, so why not take a few out with us?"
Why Sarah Palin Is So Freaking Awesome:

"I sincerely hope her first order of business is filing slander suits against anyone and everyone who filed those false accusations and trumped-up charges at her, all of which have proven to be nothing more than unnecessary taxpayer expense. Bankrupt them, Sarah."

Motivation: Truth:
"There is no diva in Sarah. Instead, Sarah Palin has served the state of Alaska with a servant's heart. I have never heard anyone talk and act with such love for a state as she does. I have never seen a leader who is constantly praising her state, talking about its wonders and beauties, and inviting people to 'come on up.' And I have never seen such a selfless act as was displayed on July 3, 2009."
DraftPalin2012:
"What the chattering class can't figure out is why anyone would give up power without being forced to because of illegality or some type of scandal. To the elites, title and power are everything, being a private citizen is nothing, and why would anyone want to become a nobody."
The Brickyard:
"Something tells me this is only the beginning for Sarah, and I for one am more than ready for the next stage of this journey."
Christians for Governor Sarah Palin 2012:
"Whether she runs for president or doesn't (and whether she wins or she doesn't) there is one thing I know for sure: Sarah Palin will make a significant, positive, lasting impact in our country & our world."
*

Well said, one and all.

- JP
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Another good article on Palin

By Victor Davis Hanson

They Say/We Say

The debate over Palin is sort of ossified.

The Left continues to ridicule her accent, family, and middling roots. The Right enjoys such authenticity-but enjoys even more the hysteria it incurs in liberals.

Will it Be Politics or Money?

But lost in all of this is whether she is up to national politics, or simply wishes to capitalize (an Oprah-like talk show?) on her sizable financial potential. On the one hand, Palin is obviously bright. Few could raise a family without capital in Wasilla, and within a decade end up as Governor of a large state-whose protocols hinged on an old-boy network where politicians accommodated oil and mineral interests.

On the other hand, a mother of five, knee-deep in local politics, without money and leisure, is not going to be reading Gibbon for perspective, or spending the afternoon perusing Foreign Affairs. Nor is she going to remember a quip that her Prof at the Kennedy school once offered years ago. Nor is she going to recall clever repartee at a Georgetown dinner party from one grandee to another.

She has natural gifts-stamina, earthy grit, sensitivity to what most Americans go through raising a family on a limited budget, practicality from working with her hands in a natural world. All that is no small beer. Look at Truman’s various experiences in Missouri.

No Way 2012-Maybe 2016, 2020?

But if, a big if, she decides to become a national political figure, Palin should use these next few years (in addition to making some money to support her family) to travel and read widely in the manner that a Reagan did in his wilderness period. She has natural intelligence and is curious. I think most would like to see her do another Couric interview five years from now after she had time to size up DC insiders, meet more politicians, lecture in front of hostile audiences-and just read and reflect. At fifty-five she could become a formidable candidate, given her natural charisma and authentic middle-class persona.

They All Resign-One Way or Another

As far as her resignation, it will be forgotten in two years. Politicians like William Weld, Bob Dole, Fred Thompson, and Bill Bradley have done it (to no real advantage).  John McCain and Barack Obama essentially resigned from the Senate by campaigning nonstop for two years (but while getting paid). In Obama’s case, it is hard to believe whether he was ever really working as a Senator, but instead almost began prepping for the Presidency (after swearing that he would not) as soon as he was elected.

So Why the Hatred?

A Huffington Post satirist offers jokes about her son Trig’s disability, and mental impairment in general.

David Letterman laughs at the notion of her 14-year-old daughter having sex in a dugout with a baseball player.

Andrew Sullivan offered up conspiracy theories about how her daughter, not Palin herself, “really” delivered Trig.

Maureen Dowd declares that “Caribou Barbie is one nutty puppy,” and laughs at the names of her children, some geese-honking in the background during her interview, even the Piper Cub tiny plane near the Palin house.

A Vanity Fair author swears that on his trip to Alaska, people came up to him and, quite independently of one another, proclaimed that Palin was a narcissist. According to Todd Purdum,  mirabile dictu, many have consulted the ol’ handy Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (which we all carry in our backpockets) and, presto, discovered that Palin has a ” pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy’ - and thought it fit her perfectly.”
 

In short, if Palin is a “nutty puppy,” these Washington and New York insiders are a deranged pack of rabid dogs. Why, though, the venom?

Let us count the ways in which Palin enrages:

False Consciousness

1)    The sophisticated elite “sees” the real world behind the middle-American façade-how the mob is led, fooled, mesmerized-exploited and manipulated through addiction to idiotic things like Wal-Mart, wall-to-wall carpeting, tract houses, Yukons, etc. Can’t smart people see that Palin’s naugahyde family is a reification of all this middle-class, mindless consumerism, without style, erudition, nuance and skepticism? How infuriating to sit here in New York and think that a winking tart could ever be elected, when seasoned sophisticates like Joe Biden and cosmopolitan metrosexuals like Barack Obama, who see it all, might not have been.

Powermen-Not Powerful Men

2)    Twenty-first century power women do not marry men like Todd Palin. Looks, physicality, practicality, courage even-all these are nineteenth-century virtues that now mean nothing in a post-modern, post-industrial society. The fixer in finance, law, academia, politics, or the media-geek, nerd, wimp, who cares?-is the new Alpha male. He has three things that we are all supposed to crave-power, capital, and influence. If one were simply to draw up a list of the fiercest female critics of Palin and trace their own lineages, one would discover that they either are married to powerful insiders, dated powerful insiders, or are the daughters of powerful insiders. (some feminists these!) Who do this Wasilla PTA mom and her broken-arm, snow-mobiling wannabe think they are?

Too Many Rug Rats

3)    Smart women do not get pregnant when it is inconvenient, especially when it interferes with one’s cursus honorum. Palin foolishly had a baby as governor, and waddled around with it the entire time-with other snotty kids in tow (just like those trashy folk at the mall who pile out of the Tahoe, in the way just as you are parking your Volvo)! And worse, in the age of sonograms and abortion, she delivered a mentally-challenged child. And worse still, the mom of five encouraged her daughter to deliver an out-of-wedlock child. (Is it in Oklahoma or Arkansas where moms and daughters have children about the same time?) And which is worse, to have a kid at 17 or one after 40? And worse, worse yet, she does not support abortion! Here is Hell in Sarah Palin’s world: I am up for a promotion at CNN, foolishly become pregnant at 42, and discover “it” has chromosomal “issues”. Am I supposed to deliver this thing? I don’t think so (nor would my daughter, should she become pregnant by her boyfriend the summer before starting off at Vassar [all that SAT camp for nothing?]).

The Alaskan Clampetts

4)  Taste, taste, taste. Sara gushes and talks like she works at Supercuts (cannot someone teach Sarah to drone through her nose?). She shops like she walked out of Wal-Mart. She winks, and gestures as if she’s running a raffle stand at a PTA carnival and flirting with the local State Farm insurance agent. These Palins and their extended family, are, well, like the Clampetts who descend on Beverly Hills. (cf. “Trig”, “Piper” and “Bristol”-the Alaskan equivalents of “Jethro Bodine”, “Jed”, and “Granny”). And if you are to have scandals in your trailer-park family, let them be elegant ones-cf. Ted Kennedy, Ted, Kennedy, Jr., Michael Kennedy, William Kennedy Smith, David Kennedy, Bobby Kennedy, Jr. and their assorted sins such as drug convictions, drug overdoses, serial sexual predations, loss of life, etc-At least sin and quote Niebuhr, or discuss alleviation of the sin in Palm Beach or Hyannis Port.

Elly May, Not Jackie

5)    There are looks and then there are looks. Brainless men without taste think Palin is “hot.” And she is in a sort of unsophisticated Carny way. But looks are really defined by an Audrey Hepburn/Jackie O understated grace, a slightly emaciated look with a grimace now and then. Or through race and gender prisms-a Michelle Obama or a model that is half-Asian, a quarter-Native American, three-quarters African-American. But a pink woman with curves that delivers kids about every two years? Come on!-in the old days, who would have preferred an Ann Margaret to a Candice Bergen? A Raquel Welch to a Mia Farrow? In our postmodern DC-NY nexus, women who are highly educated, with Ivy-League degrees, with some sort of exoticism-a French name, a trace of Indonesian ancestry, a first husband who was Nigerian-a good title such as Senior Editor at Knopf, or Executive Producer at CNN-are, by definition, sexy. And then along comes “It Came From Wasilla”, who excited these Neanderthal males at NASCAR who know nothing of classical understated, real beauty, of real pillow talk.

In the End, What is Wisdom?

6)    Euripides asked that in the Bacchae? So who is the better one to sit down across from Putin? What training is critical to size up a Chavez, or say ‘no thanks, bud’ to Iran?

Does it require brains to manage a family with five kids, live on a limited budget, get elected to local office, fish, hunt, go to sea, cook your own food, navigate in politics with no money, without an influential dad and powerbroker husband-or is real wisdom finishing prep school, doing B+ work at Yale, and writing a novel, column or short story? (A little of both, you say? That’s why I started this piece off with my suggestion she take her new time to read and digest.)

In all seriousness at last, I’ve found it was harder to calibrate an old spray rig (without getting Parquat ['liquid death' we used to call it] up your nose and Simazine down your pants), with a shot roller pump and worn nozzles. It took some skill  to put one pound (and only one pound) of Parquat and Simazine per acre on a two-foot-wide vineyard berm, correcting for tractor speed, wind, leaks, pump idiosyncrasies, soil conditions-knowing that too much preemergent herbicide gives you sick vines, and too little, weeds–than it was to do an apparatus criticus of 200 lines of the Greek text of Aeschylus’s Suppliants-all things, of course, being considered.

Sorry for the ‘either/or’ reductive binary: but I saw more stupid people in graduate school and three decades in academia than I ever did who ran 100 acres without going broke-and more of the latter whom I’d trust not to bankrupt the country and let down our defenses than of the former.

While we rightly argue that the Sarahs of the world, if they are to be taken seriously as leaders, must read and study more, why do we not also suggest that the Baracks of the world could do a little more chain-sawing, run a coffee shop for a summer, or drive a Winnebago cross-country? (Who knows, he might meet a fellow woodcutter who knew there were 50 states or that it was dumb to make fun of the Special Olympics.)

After all, a lot of geniuses are now calling for a “second stimulus” to borrow another trillion or so still, but I don’t think they come from Wasilla.

So I am afraid right now, but not of Sarah Palin.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Great article on Sarah Palin

Sarah Palin: It’s Her Party And She’ll Resign If She Wants To

by Chris Stigall

It has been amusing to watch the speculation of the Alaska Governor’s motivations and future aspirations after announcing her resignation last Friday. Senate bid? “No, Alaskans would never forgive her for leaving them” said the Sunday shows. Presidential bid? “Not possible now,” say the smartest strategists and campaigners. Host a talk show? Sell books? Go on the lecture circuit? All possible, though not all probable. But the one thing most of the pundits on both the left and the right in Washington D.C. have declared certain - Palin’s political career is D.O.A.

Not so fast, my friends. Since we’re all engaged in wild speculation, allow the reading of one more set of tea leaves, if you please.
 
You can roll your eyes and tease Palin’s supposed lightweight intellectual status. You can bury your head in shame when Charlie Gibson peers down his nose through his reading glasses and stumps her with international policy questions. You may say she had no business on the national stage from the get-go last fall when John McCain announced her as his vice presidential pick. But what you cannot ignore, nor take from her is what she is about to seize on in a big way.The dirty little secret is the 2010 and 2012 Republican candidates in both houses of Congress need Palin now more than ever. They need her just as John McCain needed her. Conservative voters both independent and Republican don’t trust the crew in Washington. Historically it is true they never have when asked. But this is not your typical “throw the bums out” mentality fomenting at tea party protests of late. This is a time when long term blue dog Democrat and Republican moderate office holders are nervously wondering, “Just how real IS the anger?” Bailouts, takeovers, stimulus spending, aggressive energy taxes, and nationalized health care have this electorate frightened and angry. The public is paying attention to their every vote, and those that are on the side of the American taxpayer will be rewarded in coming elections.
 
Then there are those politicians who got it right most of the time, but voted to bail out car companies because, “American car companies going bankrupt would signal the end of our economy.” Or a personal favorite, “Well, sure, I voted to bail out Wall Street and the banks, but, can you imagine the kind of trouble we’d be in today if I hadn’t?” One shudders to think. (Tongue firmly buried in cheek, or course.)
 
Americans aren’t buying what Washington’s selling anymore, and politicians know it. Especially wary of this fact are the damaged Republicans who bought into the economic Chicken Little routine last fall. So just how does a Republican candidate whip up a base of support when voters are angry or suspicious of their voting history? Enter the most powerful motivator and fundraiser in all of Republican politics today. 
 
Name a Republican today who could draw a larger crowd, and encourage more checks to be cut to a political candidate than Alaska’s governor. Ex-presidents don’t count, by the way. But even if you included George Bush - I think she’d give him a race for the dollar. That said - go ahead, try it. Cheney? Romney? Pawlenty? Jindal? Rove? Steele? Rice? Powell? McCain? Huckabee? Ron Paul? Nope. None of them touch the pull of Palin. Remember, it’s not about whom you like personally. It’s who can raise the most money and draw the biggest crowd that matters most in this game.
 
You don’t have to like the unseemly truth of what Reagan called “the second oldest profession.” You don’t have to like Palin’s magnetism. Heaven knows many of the names just mentioned don’t. This one-term pony from the sticks is stealing their thunder. Plain and simple, this woman is not only a license to print money; she is the belle of the ball - the envy of the Republican political establishment. Palin has achieved a level of authentic, average-Joe appeal unmatched by any Republican on the national stage since Reagan and that is sexy as hell to a party who needs money and excitement now more than ever.
 
No, they’ll not say it publicly. In fact, they’ll dismiss her influence altogether if asked. But I’ll bet my house that the weekend voice mailbox of Governor Palin was full of begging, pleading Republican Senate, House, and gubernatorial candidates humbly requesting this “erratic, irrelevant, lightweight” to come stand at their side during their upcoming picnic/potluck/town hall/ cocktail fundraiser.
 
Perhaps the political chattering class is correct. Maybe Sarah Palin isn’t electable anymore. It’s highly doubtful that even came close to the top of her list when weighing the option of resigning last week. Sarah Palin knows she holds something more powerful than elected office right now. She has a consistent, unwavering commitment to celebrating American exceptionalism, freedom, and less government in the lives of every American. She now has the ability to hold each and every politician who calls on her for help to rise to her standard and maintain the integrity of the conservative movement. Put plainly, she will now determine the standard, direction, and message of conservatism going forward if they want her help. And there can be no doubt they crave her help.  
 
She holds popularity, trust, interest, and an excitement with a sizable national constituency who listen to her more than any public official today. She can write a best-selling book, turn out big donors, and virtually steal the spot light from anyone who shares the stage. Not bad for an “erratic, lightweight, quitter with no political future.”

Sarah Palin will be around and relevant long after those quietly begging her to save their political lives today. When she leaves office in a couple of weeks, she assumes the role of the Republican’s titular kingmaker. Call it “Palin’s Green Party.” Green - the color of envy and the color of money and oh, how she’s going to create both.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sarah Palin's first speech after she resigns is at.....

 
Sarah Palin seems to be kicking off her national career from Ronald Reagan's Library, I say a good choice. Josh Painter wrote:
"Only one specific event has been announced so far that will have Gov. Palin's participation. According to the Simi Valley Republican Women Federation (SVWF), Sarah Palin will be at the Ronald Reagan Library as the guest of honor for their 50th Anniversary. That celebration is on the calendar for Saturday, August 8, at 5:30 PM. Tickets for non-members are $150. If you want to attend, the Club needs your reply with payment by July 20. We can think of no more powerful symbolism than Gov. Palin launching the national phase of her career of public service at Ronald Reagan's presidential library."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rasmussen 52% of GOP says Palin will not be hurt by her decision in 2012.

A Rassmusen Poll found the following today:

“Forty percent (40%) of Republican voters nationwide say Sarah Palin’s decision to resign as governor of Alaska hurts her chances of winning the party’s presidential nomination in 2012. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey of GOP voters finds that (24%) believe Palin’s resignation helps her chances of winning the Republican nomination, while 28% say it will have no impact on the race.”

So why does the headline read:

“40% of GOP Voters Say Resignation Hurts Palin’s Chances in 2012”

So the headline can be misleading because while 40% of Republicans believe that Sarah Palin’s decision hurt her for 2012 presidential run, THE MAJOR OF REPUBLICANS DO NOT AGREE! If you combine the 24% who believes it “helps” her with the 28% who think it will have no impact, we have 52% of Republicans WHO DO NOT BELIEVE THAT SARAH PALIN’S DECISION WILL HURT HER. Thus why is the 40% highlighted when the majority of Republicans (by 12% points) do not believe this will hurt her chances in 2012? Theses poll numbers are actually good news for Sarah Palin and not bad. Are the GOP elites at work again, attempting to attack Palin by highlighting the negative news over the positive news for Sarah Palin in order to get another GOP elitist nominated in 2012 over Sarah Palin? I cannot help but wonder.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »