About Me

Name: Allen Caeden
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Sarah Palin's media support is growing?

I was thinking about Sarah Palin’s Tea Party speech yesterday I realized that I believe she has an new and influential supporter, and this is the man who introduced her last night the internet news giant Breit Bart. Now as I see it Sarah Palin now has hardcore powerful supporters among the following in the media: Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Glenn Beck, Greta Van Susteren, Bill O’Reilly, and Dennis Miller. Why is this important? Because it provides Sarah Palin with free media coverage and public support from those who certainly have tremendous influence over the GOP primaries. Their support to Sarah Palin is invaluable in a GOP primary and they will certainly play a major role in putting Sarah Palin over the top not only in a GOP primary in 2012 but also I believe in the general election as well.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sarah Palin an international figure? You betch ya!

My former boss Jan is a white guy from South Africa now working on becoming a U.S. citizen and he once told me why he thinks Sarah Palin will at least take the GOP nomination 2012. As a business who travelled extensively on an international scale Jan likes to hear what the overseas media are saying about the global economy and even American affairs. He told me that he believes Sarah Palin was the most powerful GOP figure on the planet. He said overseas you come across only two names in American politics: Obama and Sarah Palin.  Jan told me that Sarah Palin’s is so popular that not only is she mentioned in the press overseas but her name comes in everyday conversation in places like South Africa, India, and other counties. He pointed out that you do not see either Mike Huckabee or Mitt Romney’s name anywhere overseas in either the press or in everyday conversation. Why? Because Sarah Palin is not just the GOP star she is now a SUPER-star that is burning white hot and the world overseas have taken notice.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

FOX News on Sarah Palin

 Judson Berger - FOXNews.com
February 07, 2010

Palin 'Would Be Willing' to Take On Obama in 2012

Sarah Palin has President Obama in her sights, telling FoxNews.com she "would be willing" to challenge him in the 2012 presidential race.

Sarah Palin has President Obama in her sights, telling FoxNews.com she "would be willing" to challenge him in the 2012 presidential race.

The former Alaska governor, in an interview Saturday on the sidelines of the National Tea Party Convention in Nashville, said President Obama's "lack of experience" has held him back his first year in office and that she would put her credentials up against his any day.

"I would be willing to if I believe that it's right for the country," Palin said when asked if she would run for president in 2012.

She qualified the statement, adding that she sees "many" other potential candidates who are "in as strong or stronger position than I am to take on the White House and if they're in a better position than I in three years, I'll support them."

But the former GOP vice presidential nominee told "Fox News Sunday": "I won't close the door that perhaps could be open for me in the future." 

Palin is doing more than simply dipping her toe in the water with tentative talk of presidential aspirations. Since unexpectedly leaving the Alaska Governor's Mansion last year, she's formed a political action committee, she's started endorsing and supporting candidates in the Republican primaries, she's published a book and she's been agitating the administration on a regular basis. 

She delivered the keynote address Saturday at the tea party convention, using it to hammer Obama as soft on terrorism. When convention organizer Judson Phillips mentioned the idea of "President Palin" in a question-and-answer session afterward, audience members leapt to their feet and burst into a chant of "Run, Sarah, Run."

In the near-term, Palin said she is going to focus her energy on the upcoming GOP primaries, and that she may support "hundreds" of candidates in the months ahead.  

"I do want competition to allow the cream of the crop to rise (in the GOP contests)," Palin said, adding that her support would translate into everything from donations to campaign rallies. "There are hundreds of candidates on local, state and on the national level that hopefully we'll be able to help."

Palin recently endorsed Rand Paul, the son of Texas Rep. Ron Paul, in the GOP primary for U.S. Senate in Kentucky. She said she was attracted to his limited government platform and that she's already donated to the campaign.  

Asked which other races she's focusing on, Palin, who's a Fox News analyst, said she'll "do whatever I can to help" the Republican nominee, whoever he or she is, against Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in Nevada.  

"If the election were today, Reid ... would go down," Palin said.

However, she said she doesn't have any favorites in the Republican primary -- and dismissed the idea that she fancies herself a political kingmaker.

"That's going too far because I do not have that power nor desire," she said.

During her Saturday keynote address and in her interview with FoxNews.com, Palin pointed to the tea party movement as the surging political force that will make waves in the upcoming elections.

She said tea party support will "absolutely" be critical for candidates in some districts and that the GOP should not be scared of the movement.

"It absolutely helps (the Republican Party) and those who are fearful about it and those who are trying to stir up controversy about it -- they obviously are apprehensive in terms of the message getting out there, and those people are gonna get thumped because this is a good message," she said. "Who can argue this movement?"

As Palin aligns herself more closely with the evolving tea party movement, some surveys suggest she could have the support to eventually mount a competitive presidential run -- despite tough questions raised during the 2008 campaign about her experience and qualifications. A poll last week had her leading, by a few points, the pack of potential GOP candidates. The Research 2000 poll also showed Republican voters viewing her as more qualified to be president than Obama by a 4-1 margin.  

Asked whether she believes she's more qualified than Obama, Palin showed little hesitation.

"In the campaign, we tried to bring attention to the fact that Obama had really not a lot of experience. And I do say that my executive experience, as an administrator, as a team manager if you will was, and so was John McCain's as a matter of fact, was stronger and we had more experience than Barack Obama did in terms of managing huge multi-billion dollar budgets and thousands of employees ...¦ and that hasn't changed," Palin said. 

"I think that President Obama with all due respect, his lack of experience is really made manifest in the way that decisions are made in the White House today," she added.

Palin slammed Obama in her Nashville speech for his foreign and national security policies. And with health care reform on the ropes, she told FoxNews.com it's time to pull the plug.

"I sure wish that the present tool being used to reform health care would die, but I don't trust as far as I can throw them some of the people who are saying ok, we'll slow down," she said. "What they're working on today there in Congress and the White House, it needs to die."

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sarah Palin kicking as* this weekend.

            It has been an amazingly busy weekend for Sarah Palin this weekend because she has: 1.) Given a very highly covered speech at the Tea Party Convention, 2.) Gave her first Sunday talk show appearance with Chris Wallace, and 3.) Is stumping for Texas Governor Rick Perry who is her closest political ally.

        I want to point out some things I have noticed from what I have observed this weekend. First, Sarah Palin is taking over the Tea Party Movement, not officially, but unofficially because she is by far the favorite candidate of the people of the Tea Party Movement. Second, Sarah Palin pounded Obama mercilessly in her highly covered Tea Party speech and is setting herself as the defacto anti-Obama candidate. She is deliberately picking a knife fight with the very thinned skinned Obama and it will be interesting to see how Obama responds this week to the highly publicized pounding he took by Sarah Palin. Third, and I say this as a person who checks the news on Sarah Palin every day, but this weekend I saw Sarah Palin at a new level of supreme confidence. For me it is like watching a lioness toying with the poodle that is Obama. To use a metaphor that I believe Sarah Palin would enjoy she is on the hunt for Obama, she has him politically in her crosshairs and she is looking to stuffing and mounting his political corpse on her wall in 2012.  

There are certain things that Sarah Palin knows which at this time she cannot be forthright. She knows that she is running for president in 2012. Sarah Palin knows that she owns the Tea Party Movement. Sarah Palin knows that she is the frontrunner of all GOP 2012 contenders. Sarah Palin knows that she needs a council of advisors and thus has them. Sarah Palin knows that like Reagan she needs both a grassroots movement and a political coalition that consists not only of traditional conservatives, but also the Religious Right, social conservatives, neo-conservatives, libertarians, Reagan Democrats, and fiscal conservatives. This weekend I saw Sarah Palin taking a very big step in building this coalition. This weekend clearly shows that Sarah Palin is progressing towards the White House in 2012.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Some great videos of Sarah Palin this weekend!

Here are some great videos taken from Sarah Palin's very busy weekend:

Sarah Palin's Tea Party keynote speech: http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/291974-3
 
Sarah Palin's interview with FOX New's Chris Wallace: http://www.conservatives4palin.com/
 
Sarah Palin stumpping for Texas Governor Rick Perry: http://texas4palin.blogspot.com/
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Tonight 9 PM Eastern Palin's Tea Party speech live.

Tonight you can catch Sarah Palin's Tea Party Convention speech at 9 pm Eastern at the following places live on Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, C-Span, PJTV, or Palintv. I believe this speech is going to huge and typical of Sarah Palin's ability to knock things out of the park.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Listen to Palin's speech at Salina, Kansas!

Sarah Palin's kick as* speech at Salina, Kansas yesterday can be heard at: http://www.conservatives4palin.com/ Enjoy!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mark Levin defends Palin on McCain endorsement.

  H/T to Josh Painter at Texas for Palin

“On the Mark Levin Show Thursday, The Great One rose to Sarah Palin's defense when a caller slammed the 2008 GOP vice presidential candidate for her loyalty to her former running mate John McCain (at about the 31-minute mark):”

Caller: What about Sarah Palin's endorsement of McCain? What's the story on that? She's supposed to be rogue, and it seems like a "Scratch my back, I'll scratch your back" thing. I don't know. I'm a little bummed out on her.

Levin: Well, listen. My guess is that McCain chose her to be his running mate, and she feels a level of loyalty to him. Now, that doesn't mean you have to support McCain. I have already announced that I support J.D. Hayworth, but my opinion on Sarah Palin is very high. It has not changed, and if she does it out of loyalty, you know, loyalty is a virtue as well, my friend.

Caller: That's true. I'll buy that. However, it seems to me that it's a routine like she's just another one of the [unintelligible word] or whatever. I don't know...

Levin: I don't think so. Not in any way. She's taken a lot of abuse. If you listen to her in these various interviews as I do, she's very thoughtful, very solid. And I'm guessing she's supporting McCain out of loyalty. I don't have to have any loyalty to McCain. I have loyalty to J.D. in this case because of my view that he's clearly the most conservative. On the other hand, I understand if Sarah Palin wants to back John McCain. I wouldn't vote for John McCain, but I understand her loyalty. And that really doesn't bother me that much.

Caller: All right. Well, I understand she is in a "Scratch my back, I'll scratch your back" kind of thing with him, and...

Levin: No, no, it's not "scratch your..." She's not getting anything out of backing him. In fact, she's getting some conservatives like you who are questioning her. So it's not like she's doing it to get a favor from him. He can't deliver her anything.

Caller: Right.

Levin: So if it's "Scratch your back, scratch my back" you have to assume you're getting something in return, and she's not. But now that you mention it, I could use a good back scratch, to be perfectly honest with you.

Caller: Well, you keep it up, Mark. I appreciate how great a voice you are in this dark world out here, especially in this L.A. area. So, there's a lot of us who listen to you, and I just thank you so much for everything you're doing.

Levin: Well, you're a good man, my brother, and God bless. And I appreciate you.

Caller: God bless you. When we get to heaven, I want to meet you, all right?

Levin: Ah, aren't you sweet, and thank you, my friend. And let's not do that too fast. Okay? We've got a little time left. I'm a big Sarah Palin fan. And by the way, she's a big Rush Limbaugh fan. Don't let the folks at Politico twist what Sarah Palin's spokeswoman said and so forth. Everything's copacetic.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sarah Palin or Mitt Romney that is the GOP's choice in 2012.

  After today’s hit piece by Andrea Tantaros on Sarah Palin’s potential run for 2012, and let’s be honest folks she is running for president in 2012. I should point out that while Sarah Palin tops the charts of the two most recent polls (Zogby & Research2000) on potential GOP 2012 candidates, Mitt Romney comes in second place. Folk’s this is the same Mitt Romney that has brought the State of Massachusetts  to the verge of bankruptcy with the socialized medicine he instituted in his state as governor; this is also the same Mitt Romney who throughout his long career has consistently trashed Ronald Reagan and his policies. Folk’s if Sarah Palin does not win the nomination and the RINO Mitt Romney the GOP may be doomed, because you can say goodbye to the Tea Party folks, Traditional Conservatives (like myself), libertarians, and the Religious Right. A Mitt Romney nomination would be catastrophic for the GOP and maybe its deathblow. See here for what Mitt Romney really believes via Youtube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9IJUkYUbvI

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Andrea Tantaros has very bad advice for Sarah Palin!

I was going to wait but I am going to comment on this tonight because it makes my blood boil, let me just quickly write: "et tu Tantaros?" Today Andrea Tantaros wrote a piece stating that Sarah Palin should become the next “Oprah”. Miss Tantaros wrote:

With the exit of Oprah Winfrey now slated for 2011, is Sarah Palin, former governor of Alaska, first female GOP vice presidential candidate, mother, author, liberal hallucinogen and now television commentator, poised to fill the void left by the Queen of Talk? You betcha. Though many believe she's set her sights on the White House in 2012, Palin should get this through her head now: She would be far more influential as a talk show host than she would be as a presidential candidate, and she should start planning her career trajectory accordingly.

Now as a Sarah Palin supporter I find this insulting since I have no respect for Oprah at all, in fact I believe the nation’s largest cult consist of Oprah and a bunch of silly housewives. What also makes my blood boil is that Miss Tantaros is taking a swipe at Sarah Palin’s political future and is pretty blunt about it, she wrote:

I say this not because Palin is incapable of being an impactful politician, but because she has been profoundly hindered by the left's hateful and perplexing obsession with demeaning and destroying her at all costs. That sadly renders her a distraction to both parties - one who'd be better off stepping out of the political limelight (at least for now) and into the TV spotlight. If you think the deep division and party gridlock is bad with President Obama, the alleged uniter, at the helm, picture what a Palin candidacy - and, if that works out, a Palin presidency - would bring. She could barely govern in Alaska with the onslaught of allegations and baseless lawsuits thrown at her daily. Life in the lower 48 would be increasingly more challenging.

With all due respect Miss Tantaros you need to be corrected on some points and facts of history. First, while it is true that the leftist media have attacked Sarah Palin like no other political figure in a generation they have not succeeded in destroying her. It is true that after she had resigned as Governor of Alaska she took a hit in the polls. However, since the release of her record breaking book, her book tour, media blitz, and now a stint on FOX News she has gone back up in favorability ratings and not down. Two recent polls show Sarah Palin as the front runner of the GOP in a 2012 primary: a Zogby Poll and one by the liberal Daily Kos conducted by Research2000.

I now want to address this notion that she could not govern Alaska and that “life in the lower 48 would be increasingly more challenging”. No Miss Tantaros you are greatly mistaken and for the following reasons. First, Alaska has a deeply flawed ethics law that allows for anonymous people to file endless ethics complaints against Alaska’s governor at no cost to themselves. The Alaskan governor then has to pay a private attorney to defend them and the cost is not picked up by the State of Alaska. Sarah Palin through some 20 frivolous ethics complaints was brought to the verge of personal bankruptcy and thus was forced to resign. Now show me where there is such a flawed federal law that could be used against a sitting U.S. President? Miss Tantaros there is no parallel between what occurred with Alaska’s deeply flawed ethics laws and the U.S. Federal government.

I now want to bring up the issue that Sarah Palin is “divisive” and that this apparently is not a
good thing. Miss Tantaros is young so I will cut her some slack in knowing her U.S. History. Ronald Reagan ran for the White House three times (winning in 1980): 1968, 1976, and 1980. After losing to Gerald Ford in 1976 Reagan was ready to give up and his only support and encouragement came from Senator Jessie Helms who urged him on. In 1980 Reagan once again ran and once again he was vilified not only by the left but even more so by the GOP establishment. Undaunted Reagan led a massive conservative grassroots effort and beat the GOP establishment and won the GOP nomination. It should still be pointed out that Reagan was so divisive that do you know by what percentage he won the general election in 1980? He won by 50.7% of the vote, Obama won with 52% of the vote. Obama actually won in 2008 by a greater margin than Reagan did in 1980, thus showing that Reagan in 1980 like Sarah Palin today was quite “divisive”. Maybe if Andrea Tantaros was around between 1976 and 1980 she would have advised Ronald Reagan to get his own “talk show” and forgo the 1980 election, but history would have turned out quite differently if Reagan had listed to the Tantaros types that abounded in the late 1970’s. Also Miss Tantaros have you forgotten how vicious and relentlessly President Reagan was attacked by the left while he was the sitting U.S. President? They threw everything at him but nothing stuck earning Reagan the nickname as being “The Teflon President”, but still President Reagan managed to effectively govern the nation if the face of constant political attacks. So Miss Tantaros answer me this: if Reagan could do it then why can’t Sarah Palin as well?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sarah Palin: Why I am speaking at the Tea Party Convention.

Why I'm speaking at Tea Party convention

By Sarah Palin

Later this week I'll head to Nashville, where I'll have the honor of speaking with members of the Tea Party movement. I look forward to meeting many Americans who share a commitment to limited government, common sense and personal responsibility. This movement is truly a grassroots, organic effort. It's not a top-down organization; it's a ground-up call to action that already has both political parties rethinking the way they do business.

From the town halls last summer to the protests and marches in the fall to the game-changing recent elections, it has been inspiring to see real people — not politicos or inside-the-Beltway professionals — speak out for common-sense conservative policies and values. As with all grassroots efforts, the nature of this movement means that sometimes the debates are loud and the organization is messier than that of a polished, controlled machine. Legitimate disagreements take place about tone and tactics. That's OK, because this movement is about bigger things than politics or organizers.

The soul of the Tea Party is the people who belong to it — everyday Americans who grow our food, run our small businesses, teach our children how to read, serve the less fortunate and fight our wars. They're folks in small towns and cities across this nation who saw what was happening to our country and decided to get involved. Thank God for them. Many of these good Americans had never been involved in their government before, but now they attend town hall meetings and participate in online forums. They write letters to the editor. They sign up to be precinct leaders and run for local office and support other independent patriots. They have the courage to stand up and speak out.

Their vision is what drew me to the Tea Party movement. They believe in the same principles that guided my work in public service — whether I was working on the PTA and city council or serving as a mayor, commissioner or governor. I look forward to meeting some of these great Americans this weekend.

Recently, some have tried to portray this movement as a commercial endeavor rather than the grassroots uprising that it is. Those who do so don't understand the frustration everyday Americans feel when they see their government mortgaging their children's future with reckless spending. The spark of patriotic indignation that inspired those who fought for our independence and those who marched peacefully for civil rights has ignited once again. You can't buy such a sentiment. You can't AstroTurf it. It springs from love of country and the knowledge that we can make a difference if we just stand up and stand together.

I thought long and hard about my participation in this weekend's event. At the end of the day, my decision came down to this: It's important to keep faith with people who put a little bit of their faith in you. Everyone attending this event is a soldier in the cause. Some of them will be driving hundreds of miles to Nashville. I made a commitment to them to be there, and I am going to honor it.

But participation won't be limited to those in Nashville who have a ticket. It's much bigger than that. Because the Tea Party movement is spread out across the country — with no central offices or annual events — this is an opportunity to connect with like-minded folks. Yes, there will be speeches given in a room in Nashville. But we'll also be speaking with thousands of Americans watching online at twitter.com/SarahPalinUSA, or through various news outlets. And the conversation will continue on my Facebook page.

I will not benefit financially from speaking at this event. My only goal is to support the grassroots activists who are fighting for responsible, limited government — and our Constitution. In that spirit, any compensation for my appearance will go right back to the cause.

The nature of the Tea Party movement means there may never be a "perfectly orchestrated" event: Democracy in action doesn't come with a manual. But we must not get caught up in the politics or the controversies that some hope will distract from the heart of the movement. The focus must remain on our ideas and beliefs, and on supporting those ideas and beliefs however we can.

This weekend, it's Nashville, but in March, I'll head to Searchlight, Nev., for the kickoff rally at the Tea Party Express III. In April, I'll be in Boston for a Tea Party gathering there. Across the country, tea-partiers will be sharing our vision for America's future, a vision that promotes common sense solutions to out-of-control spending and an out-of-touch political establishment.

The process may not always be pretty or perfect, but the message is loud and clear: We want a government worthy of the fine Americans that it serves. And we're going to keep spreading that message one convention, one town hall, one speech and one election at a time.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sarah Palin: Obama is out of control & America is in danger!

The White House recently announced its pricey Childhood Obesity Initiative to tell us what we should feed our kids. Helpful I’m sure – but most Americans would rather see government focus on other important areas right now. We know what our kids should eat: more healthy food, less junk food. There – we just saved Washington a ton of money by announcing that finding on personal responsibility.

What does demand our full attention is the newly released $3,800,000,000,000 federal budget. The president and Congress have a huge job tackling the problem staring right at us as we look at a budget we obviously can’t afford. America’s freedom and security are endangered as we become beholden to other nations, thanks to ballooning deficits and debt. One congressman just warned that our nation may become insolvent if we don’t make better decisions starting now. As noted in a New York Times article today, unless “miraculous growth” or miraculous unforeseen change is on the horizon, America’s freedom, influence, and security will continue to erode. (Personally, at this point I believe it wouldn’t hurt to ramp up our nation’s humble request for the divine miraculous change and wisdom we’ll need to see us through.)

Getting our arms around this will take all of us working together, making sacrifices, taking more personal responsibility, and sending elected leaders to Washington that we can trust. That’s why some of us may come across as strident in our efforts to call out the White House and Congress. We want to trust you, Washington; we want to work with you, but we cannot stomach some of the things being rammed down our throats. Your actions to pile on more debt make no sense, so we must question your motives and intentions. For instance, there’s just no room for expensive, dangerous, and unsustainable new initiatives like Obamacare, Cap and Tax, and a dramatically expanded federal payroll. These government-growing proposals will obviously cause more problems than they’ll solve. They are just further steps towards insolvency.

Steps towards insolvency are steps away from freedom. They’re steps towards destruction. It’s the reason we ask why we should swallow what's coming out of Washington.

The Wall Street Journal has a brilliant column by Gerald Seib today. It reads in part:

The U.S. government this year will borrow one of every three dollars it spends, with many of those funds coming from foreign countries. That weakens America’s standing and its freedom to act; strengthens China and other world powers including cash-rich oil producers; puts long-term defense spending at risk; undermines the power of the American system as a model for developing countries; and reduces the aura of power that has been a great intangible asset for presidents for more than a century.

“We’ve reached a point now where there’s an intimate link between our solvency and our national security,” says Richard Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations and a senior national-security adviser in both the first and second Bush presidencies. “What’s so discouraging is that our domestic politics don’t seem to be up to the challenge. And the whole world is watching.”

In the 21st-century world order, the classic, narrow definition of national-security threats already has expanded in ways that make traditional foreign-policy thinking antiquated. The list of American security concerns now includes dependence on foreign oil and global warming, for example.

Consider just four of the ways that budget deficits also threaten American’s national security:

• They make America vulnerable to foreign pressures.

The U.S. has about $7.5 trillion in accumulated debt held by the public, about half of that in the hands of investors abroad.

Aside from the fact that each American next year will chip in more than $800 just to pay interest on this debt, that situation means America’s government is dependent on the largesse of foreign creditors and subject to the whims of international financial markets. A foreign government, through the actions of its central bank, could put pressure on the U.S. in a way its military never could. Even under a more benign scenario, a debt-ridden U.S. is vulnerable to a run on the American dollar that begins abroad.

Either way, Mr. Haass says, “it reduces our independence.”

• Chinese power is growing as a result.

A lot of the deficit is being financed by China, which is selling the U.S. many billions of dollars of manufactured goods, then lending the accumulated dollars back to the U.S. The IOUs are stacking up in Beijing.

So far this has been a mutually beneficial arrangement, but it is slowly increasing Chinese leverage over American consumers and the American government. At some point, the U.S. may have to bend its policies before either an implicit or explicit Chinese threat to stop the merry-go-round.

Just this weekend, for example, the U.S. angered China by agreeing to sell Taiwan $6.4 billion in arms. At some point, will the U.S. face economic servitude to China that would make such a policy decision impossible?


Please read the rest of Seib’s column here. Our out-of-control spending is weakening our country. We can no longer afford to kick the can down the road to the next generation. We need to have a serious discussion about our spending priorities before it's too late. Commonsense conservatives have a sincere desire to work with the White House on these challenges, and we’re thankful for those in Congress making the offer to help.

- Sarah Palin
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sarah Palin on Obama's reckless budget.

The newly-released mind-boggling, record-smashing $3,400,000,000,000 federal budget invites plenty of opportunity to debate the merits of incurring more and more debt that will drown the next generation of Americans. Never has it been possible to spend your way out of debt. So... let the debate begin.

Included in the debate process will be opportunities for our president to deliberate internally the wisdom of this debt explosion, along with other economic, military and social issues facing our country. Our president will discuss these important issues with Democrat leaders and those within his inner circle. I would ask the president to show decency in this process by eliminating one member of that inner circle, Mr. Rahm Emanuel, and not allow Rahm’s continued indecent tactics to cloud efforts. Yes, Rahm is known for his caustic, crude references about those with whom he disagrees, but his recent tirade against participants in a strategy session was such a strong slap in many American faces that our president is doing himself a disservice by seeming to condone Rahm’s recent sick and offensive tactic.

The Obama Administration’s Chief of Staff scolded participants, calling them, “F---ing retarded,” according to several participants, as reported in the Wall Street Journal.

Just as we’d be appalled if any public figure of Rahm’s stature ever used the “N-word” or other such inappropriate language, Rahm’s slur on all God’s children with cognitive and developmental disabilities – and the people who love them – is unacceptable, and it’s heartbreaking.

A patriot in North Andover, Massachusetts, notified me of Rahm’s “retarded” slam. I join this gentleman, who is the father of a beautiful child born with Down Syndrome, in asking why the Special Olympics, National Down Syndrome Society and other groups condemning Rahm’s degrading scolding have been completely ignored by the White House. No comment from his boss, the president?

As my friend in North Andover says, “This isn’t about politics; it’s about decency. I am not speaking as a political figure but as a parent and as an everyday American wanting my child to grow up in a country free from mindless prejudice and discrimination, free from gratuitous insults of people who are ostensibly smart enough to know better... Have you no sense of decency, sir?”

Mr. President, you can do better, and our country deserves better.

- Sarah Palin
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sarah Palin on Obamacare.

What am I missing, folks? We’re called obstructionists and made to feel uninformed in the Obamacare debate as we point out this is not a patient-driven, market-oriented approach to health care cost challenges. We’ve been saying for months that this is government takeover of our personal choices of insurers and doctors. We’re called liars when claiming that this is all about government mandates and control of up to a sixth of our economy.

And yet, shockingly, the president admitted yesterday exactly what we’ve been saying: that his Democrats and lobbyists have crafted bills that in fact will prevent us from keeping our current insurance and/or choosing our own doctor. He said:

The last thing I will say, though -- let me say this about health care and the health care debate, because I think it also bears on a whole lot of other issues. If you look at the package that we’ve presented -- and there’s some stray cats and dogs that got in there that we were eliminating, we were in the process of eliminating. For example, we said from the start that it was going to be important for us to be consistent in saying to people if you can have your -- if you want to keep the health insurance you got, you can keep it, that you’re not going to have anybody getting in between you and your doctor in your decision making. And I think that some of the provisions that got snuck in might have violated that pledge. [emphasis added]


Thanks to Tom Bevan at RCP for spotting this. The president’s statement is shocking, enlightening, and in an odd and unfortunate way also encouraging. Folks, this admission tells us we’re not off-base and we need to stay vigilant so we’re not missing anything else in this scheme. This trillion-dollar government takeover of our health care system is full of “stray dogs and cats” (the president’s words, not mine), and that’s what we’ve been saying all along.

Commonsense conservatives have better ideas on how to start tackling rising health care costs. Reps. Paul Ryan, Mike Pence, Eric Cantor, John Boehner, and others have offered solutions. I commend their efforts to counter the White House’s attempt to ram Obamacare through as these Congressmen seek bipartisan, sensible solutions. I implore them to speak louder because we’re listening, and we’re counting on them!

- Sarah Palin
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sarah Palin on NY City & terrorists.

People are celebrating the fact that the Obama Administration is considering relocating the terrorists’ trial from New York to another American city. Yet there’s still no talk of moving the trial out of our U.S. civilian courts to where it should take place – a military tribunal.

Now the administration is backtracking in order to fix its initially blundered decision to try these dangerous terrorists in New York City despite the great danger and cost to New Yorkers. This scenario is all too common in Washington. The tactic is to propose something so outrageous that the public will rise up and demand common sense, and then the White House “concedes” and changes its initial decision to give the impression of newfound reasonability and moderation. But the problem still isn’t solved! The trial location debate becomes a diversion so that we’ll take our eyes off the ball. The point missed is that our President still wants to give these terrorists U.S. constitutional protections in our civilian courts, allowing them to lawyer-up on our dime.

This tactic is in the same vein as another Washington game: creating the appearance of a “crisis” in order to push for a radical solution. (“The health care crisis must be fixed by government now or we’re all gonna die! The earth’s temperature is fluctuating; government must fix this crisis now or we’re all gonna die! Private businesses made poor decisions and bureaucrats claim they’re too big to fail, so government must fix this crisis now or we’re all gonna die!”) Politicians and lobbyists announce that there is a “crisis,” and never letting a good crisis go to waste, they propose a radical solution to fix it. The public listens intently, and in a sincere desire to help, an alternative to the politicians’ radical solution gets put forward. The politicians then “concede” and mellow out their radical solution. The public’s attention has been diverted to tinkering on the periphery, all the while ignoring the real problem at the heart of the “crisis” that started the whole debate.

The fact is our government has a choice as to where to try the terrorists. We don’t have to try them in our civilian courts. The peripheral debate regarding in which city to try these evil, dangerous haters-of-America is a diversion. Let’s get back to the heart of the matter: what choice will our government make – terrorist trials in civilian courts or military tribunals?

- Sarah Palin
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123Next »